Close

Articles Posted in Uncategorized

Updated:

Drugs on a Plane: Sherman Plano Federal Court International Jurisdiction (Part Three)

In Morrison v. National Australia Bank, 561 U.S. 247 (2010), the Supreme Court applied the presumption against extraterritoriality to securities fraud statutes. Again in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, 133 S.Ct. 1659 (2013), the Supreme Court applied the presumption and held the plaintiff lacked extraterritorial jurisdiction under the Alien Tort…

Updated:

Drugs on a Plane: Sherman Plano Federal Court International Jurisdiction (Part Two)

However, there is a “longstanding principle of American law that legislation of Congress, unless a contrary intent appears, is meant to apply only within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.” Morrison v. Nat’l Austl. Bank Ltd., 561 U.S. 247, 255, (2010)   “The presumption against extraterritoriality is only a presumption;…

Updated:

Drugs on a Plane: Sherman Plano Federal Court International Jurisdiction (Part One)

I was having a few flashbacks to civil procedure class in a recent Federal extradition case recently.  In law school, we had to learn the International Shoe standard of “minimum contacts which do not disturb traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice” according to International Shoe, whereby a state…

Contact Us